电视胸腔镜食管癌切除术模块化流程的临床应用

Clinical application of modularized operative process during video assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

  • 摘要: 目的:评价模块化胸腔镜食管癌切除在微创食管癌切除术中的应用价值。
    方法:回顾性分析2011年12月至2012年12月第三军医大学大坪医院收治的45例胸段食管癌患者的临床资料,采用模块化手术流程行胸腔镜食管癌切除+胃食管颈部吻合术。患者按食管癌术前准备,行电视胸腔镜联合腹腔镜食管癌切除术或电视胸腔镜食管癌切除+开腹游离胃手术。胸腔镜食管游离及纵隔淋巴结清扫按照模块化流程(针对患者情况进行灵活排列组合)进行:(1)下肺韧带游离及下段食管旁、下肺韧带(第8L、9组)淋巴结清扫。(2)奇静脉弓下食管的游离。(3)游离奇静脉弓上食管。(4)奇静脉弓的离断。(5)胸段食管的完全游离。(6)结扎胸导管。(7)清扫下气管旁、主肺动脉窗、隆凸下、双侧肺门以及左侧喉返神经旁(第4、5、7、10、2L组)淋巴结。采用电话或信件联系方式对患者术后进行随访。术后1年内每3个月门诊复查胸腹部CT及纤维胃镜了解有无肿瘤复发及转移,超过1年后每半年检查1次。随访时间截至2013年2月。
    结果:45患者中,行电视胸腔镜联合腹腔镜食管癌切除术29例,电视胸腔镜食管癌切除+开腹游离胃手术16例。肿瘤长度为(4.2±2.5)cm,AJCC分期T1、T2、T3、T4期患者分别为7、14、15、9例,N0、N1、N2、N3期患者分别为23、13、7、2例。45例患者胸腔内操作时间为(72±13)min,总手术时间为(249±39)min,术中出血量为(183±62)ml,术中清扫淋巴结数目为(27±7)枚,术后住院时间为(18±7)d。2例患者中转开胸手术。45例患者均无术后死亡发生,术后发生并发症11例次(2例患者出现两种并发症),6例发生颈部吻合口瘘,4例出现吻合口狭窄,3例出现声音嘶哑。45例患者均获得随访,随访时间为1.5~14.0个月,平均随访时间为8个月。1例患者于术后12个月因上消化道大出血死亡,1例患者于术后8个月因肝转移引发MODS死亡,其余43例均生存。
    结论:电视胸腔镜食管癌切除术中采用模块化手术流程安全、可行,具有良好的近期效果。

     

    Abstract: Objective To evaluate the modularized operative process during video assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Methods The clinical data of 45 patients with esophageal cancer who were admitted to the Daping Hospital from December 2011 to December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. The influence of modularized operative process on the intra and post operative condition and short term complications after video assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy+esophagogastric anastomosis were analyzed to investigate the efficacy and value of modularized operative process. Patients received video assisted thoracoscopic and laparoscopic resection of esophageal carcinoma or thoracoscopic resection of esophageal carcinoma+gastric mobilization. Thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization and mediastinal lymph nodes dissection were done according to the modularized operative process: (1) Pulmonary ligament mobilization and groups 8L and 9 lymph nodes dissection. (2) Mobilization of the esophagus under the arcus venae azygos. (3) Mobilization of esophagus above the arcus venae azygos. (4) Transection of the arcus venae azygos. (5) Complete removal of thorax esophgus. (6) Ligation of thoracic duct. (7) Dissection of groups 4, 5, 7, 10 and 2L lymph nodes. All the patients were followed up via phone call or mail till February 2013. Patients received thoracoabdominal computed tomography and gastrofiberscopy to detect tumor recurrence or metastasis every 3 months within the first year after the operation, and they were re examinated every half year at 1 year later.
    Results Of the 45 patients, 29 received video assisted thoracoscopic and laparoscopic resection of esophageal carcinoma and 16 received video assisted thoracoscopic resection of esophageal carcinoma+gastric mobilization. The length of the tumor was (4.2±2.5)cm. The numbers of patients in AJCC T1, T2, T3 and T4 stages were 7, 14, 15 and 9, and the number of patients with AJCC N0, N1, N2, N3 stages were 23, 13, 7, 2, respectively. The intrathoracic operation time, total operation time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, number of lymph node resected and postoperative duration of hospital stay were (72±13)minutes, (249±39)minutes, (183±62)ml, 27±7, (18±7)days, respectively. Two patients were transferred to open surgery. No patient died postoperatively, and 11 complications were detected after the operation. Six patients were complicated with cervical anastomotic fistula, 4 with anastomotic stricture and 3 with hoarseness. Forty five patients were followed for 1.5 14.0 months with the median follow up time of 8 months. One patient died of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage at postoperative month 12, and 1 died of multi organ dysfunction syndrome at postoperative month 8. The remaining 43 patients survived.
    Conclusions The modularized operative process for thoracoscopic esophagectomy is safe and effective, its short term efficacy is satisfactory.

     

/

返回文章
返回